Evaluate the main arguments for and against the censorship of films and tv programmes for children

For critical discussions of this approach see SchauerFeinbergMacKinnon NOT - or, to tie it into the instruction at the bottom of the edit box, it is not "encyclopedic content". Wood illustrated how teenagers may use horror films to gratify their need for excitement.

But it might be that this ordinary conception, on reflection, turns out not to capture what is of moral and political interest and importance. We cannot assume that natural rights exist. The effects model also fails to put violence into context, e. They argue that consolidation is not competitive and that corporate owners might restrict or manipulate news coverage.

Morley concluded that people choose to read or interpret media content in three ways. With other GFDL-projects such as Wiktionary, the subsequent editor can freely move the content to the other project.

We have some rules in place for that, but the potentially harmful images and information are still accessible to everyone and Wikipedia cannot see who is on the recieving end and the rules have loopholes to avoid destroying core Wikipedia freedoms.

Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 8

Many of these concerns figure in a somewhat new light in a significant, rights-based strand of feminist argument, associated most prominently with Catharine MacKinnon. Your recent change to the WP: Consumption of pornography may, on its own, be neither necessary nor sufficient for violent sexual crime or for sexist attitudes and behaviour more generally ; yet it might still be a cause of violent sexual crime and these other harms, if it increases the incidence of them.

Furedi argues that moral panics arise when society fails to adapt to dramatic social changes and it is felt that there is a loss of control, especially over powerless groups such as the young.

The section about license incompatibility is a caution not so much to the original contributor but to subsequent editors who may be cutting content out of the Wikipedia article in compliance with the first sentence of this clause.

Multiple studies have come to the conclusion that youth who are avid TV watchers become aggressive adults. In other words, that the morality of an action is based off of results and that results that maximize happiness and minimize pain are moral.

Their uses and gratifications model suggests that people use the media in order to satisfy particular social needs that they have, e. The photo was relevant, but added little to the article. However, critics of this model point out two problems.

They monitor the internet access their children undertake. How can you, as a parent, monitor what your child watches on television? Report this Argument Pro I thank my opponent for this response. These theorists often follow social science researchers in drawing more fine-grained distinctions within the general category of pornography i.

For instance, dictionary entries are verifiable, neutral and not original research. The question of pornography and censorship has divided feminists, just as it has begun to divide liberals.

Since Wikipedia lacks the "all-seing eye of God" any measures put in place would have to make sweeping assumptions and restrict everyone's access rights, such as forcing paid accounts to use the encyclopedia.

However, some material seems clearly to count as sexually explicit in many contexts today: But the ordinance was significant, not least for reconceptualizing the question of pornography in the public arena in feminist terms: There are different types of media violence such as in cartoons, images of war and death on news bulletins and sporting violence.

Could somebody please explain or, even better, make this sentence understandable on first reading? In certain circumstances, the press might release information, as wikileaks did, that could endanger national security. Surely if the government is concerned about taking the most effective approaches to protecting children it is more appropriate to first target those professions and areas that have repeatedly demonstrated significantly higher risks to children?

In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute.The question of pornography and censorship has divided feminists, just as it has begun to divide liberals. Some feminists argue that pornography is an important form of sexual expression that does not harm women, and may even benefit them by liberating women and women's sexuality from the oppressive shackles of tradition and sexual conservatism.

A Look at the Arguments for and Against Censorship Essay; A Look at the Arguments for and Against Censorship Essay. Words 7 Pages. obedient children and a firm religious foundation. Crime, violence, divorce, abortion, and homosexuality did not exist in that fantasy-past, so they must never appear in any schoolbooks.

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. TV corrupts our children. You can't put a name on TV just because it has a few bad shows. If you have a problem, don't watch TV.

But just because it may go against what you like doesn't mean you have to go around saying all that stuff! It's your opinion, but that doesn't mean all TV shows are bad, so keep it to yourself. Most of the. The main reason is that censorship is not properly imposed or there is a need of censorship in the society.

Television Censorship will save our children.

Censorship is the suppression of ideas and information that certain people, individual, groups or government officials find it objectionable, offensive or dangerous on others. Overall, I feel that the arguments against censorship are misinterpreted and that society needs new policy to be written that puts more trust in the people.

There are also arguments for television censorship.

Evaluate the main arguments for and against the censorship of films and tv programmes for children
Rated 5/5 based on 26 review